1. The article presents many different viewpoints on collaboration do you feel that collaboration is something that can produce something as good or even better than you could on your own?

2. The structure of this article is interesting as it is composed as a series of quotes. Do you think that this is an effective way to communicate what they were trying to convey? or is it just distracting to the reader?

3. More than one of the quotes brings up the issue of the honorary credit sort of given to senior professors, Do you think this is an entirely negative thing given that having an established name on your work might garner it wider readership?