Questions Hampe

1. Hampe advises us to forget what we were trying to shoot and see what we really got, does that mean that the raw footage should determine the direction in which your argument might go?

2. According to Hampe, if you turn off the sound and can understand what's going on you have strong visual evidence, does this mean that sound evidence is unimportant or maybe even weakens your message?

3. Hampe illustrates how filmmakers can manipulate the editing of footage to convey biased messages. How might we as the audience deal with this possibility when viewing documentaries.?